Read TruthInConviction at

Wednesday, January 28, 2009


J. Grant Swank, Jr.

Sexually Transmitted Diseases are indeed a problem. But is that category due $335,000,000 as a part of the economic stimulus package?

Dems seem to think that it belongs right there. Stimulus? I know how that relates to sex. But I don’t get how it relates to our nation’s money angst. Any suggestions? Logical ones, I mean.

Is there any doubt that sex is a big part of our American way of life, but even to upping the financial bailout quotient?

Of course, those acquainted with the government sponsorship via tax moneys of sex this and that in the United States education, so-called, understand that some of it is quite on the seamy side.

However, for government, being run now by liberals for whom ethics is relativistic, anything goes. Even when hauling away financial bags for sex something or other.

"’Whether this funding has merit is not the question; the point is it has no business in an economic plan supposedly focused on job creation,’" says a stimulated Hill source per DrudgeReport.

Funds would flow through the Center for Disease Control and Prevention.

Will those nickels and dimes go toward underwriting “Booty Call” and “Great Sex” as in the past?

Only the Congressional Dem stimulated seem to know.