THE DEVIL’S IN THE DETAILS: GORE’S CLIMATE WARMING MUMBO JUMBO
J. Grant Swank, Jr.
“The conspiracy behind the Anthropogenic Global Warming myth (aka AGW; aka ManBearPig) has been suddenly, brutally and quite deliciously exposed after a hacker broke into the computers at the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (aka CRU) and released 61 megabytes of confidential files onto the internet. (Hat tip: Watts Up With That).”
So now it’s been uncovered that politics and ego have played a prime role in the so-called global warming religion.
Al Gore, champion charlatan, now wipes egg off his face. Fine for truth.
Telegraph.co.uk’s James Delingo provides a revealing overview.
Emails back and forth from those trumpeting the climate creeds of global heat-up have surfaced, now much to the writers’ embarrassment.
Therefore, we can conclude that not only Barack Hussein Obama is committed to lying, per his Muslim “ethic” writ in the Koran. But other dark-side game-players have taken on lying as a virtue.
Those lifting high truth are warned repeatedly that it is to be “wise as snakes and harmless as doves.”
Read the surfaced emails for yourself:
“As Andrew Bolt puts it, this scandal could well be ‘the greatest in modern science’. These alleged emails – supposedly exchanged by some of the most prominent scientists pushing AGW theory – suggest:
“Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more.”
And now this:
Writer James Delingpole states: “One of the alleged emails has a gentle gloat over the death in 2004 of John L Daly (one of the first climate change sceptics, founder of the Still Waiting For Greenhouse site), commenting:
“’In an odd way this is cheering news.’”
Imagine that for defending facts alone. Imagine the truth-tellers closeted while the politico-money-hungry warm religionists pound away for whatever they can gain from lying.
Now get this next email:
“I’ve just completed Mike’s Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith’s to hide the decline.”
Read every word and uncover deceit maximum at work in this email:
“The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.”
Read it again: “’Our observing system is inadequate.’”
Disciples of this warm religion collaborate to destroy damaging emails:
“Can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith re AR4?
“Keith will do likewise. He’s not in at the moment – minor family crisis.
“Can you also email Gene and get him to do the same? I don’t have his new email address.
“We will be getting Caspar to do likewise.”
Then the urge to violently attack those not bowing down at the warm religion altars:
“Next time I see Pat Michaels at a scientific meeting, I’ll be tempted to beat the crap out of him. Very tempted.”
Here is an email trying to cover up the “inconvenient truth of the Medieval Warm Period (MWP)”:
“Phil and I have recently submitted a paper using about a dozen NH records that fit this category, and many of which are available nearly 2K back–I think that trying to adopt a timeframe of 2K, rather than the usual 1K, addresses a good earlier point that Peck made w/ regard to the memo, that it would be nice to try to ‘contain’ the putative ‘MWP’, even if we don’t yet have a hemispheric mean reconstruction available that far back. . .”
What are the warm religionists to do with scientists who continue to expose the warmist lies? Read it:
“This was the danger of always criticizing the skeptics for not publishing in the ‘peer-reviewed literature’. Obviously, they found a solution to that–take over a journal! So what do we do about this?
“I think we have to stop considering ‘Climate Research’ as a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. Perhaps we should encourage our colleagues in the climate research community to no longer submit to, or cite papers in, this journal.
“We would also need to consider what we tell or request of our more reasonable colleagues who currently sit on the editorial board…What do others think?
“I will be emailing the journal to tell them I’m having nothing more to do with it until they rid themselves of this troublesome editor.”
Read “Climategate: the final nail in the coffin of 'Anthropogenic Global Warming'?” at http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100017393/climategate-the-final-nail-in-the-coffin-of-anthropogenic-global-warming/